The Case Against Barack Obama

Regarding "Hope" and "Change": What HOPE has an unborn child or even a born child that results from an unsuccessful abortion? Obama doesn't know or has no opinion as to when a human being attains the age to be accorded the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, or, as the question put to him lately, when does a human being become entitled to human rights? He really was afraid to offend one of his rich supporters, Planned Parenthood, one of the country's most powerful (and I might add tax-supported) abortion providers (and whose clientele is largely people of his own race, who are being the object of virtual genocide) and other powerful lobbies and a large part of his base who support abortion on demand. No matter how you stand on abortion, Obama is unwilling to admit his own position either way, which makes him a COWARD in my book.

As for "Change, what kind of change does Biden represent? Business as usual is not change. He opted for a dyed-in-the-wool Washington insider whose last wish would be change of the status quo. AND he is the third most liberal voter in the Senate (read higher taxes, more gov't control, more socialistic programs, etc.). He has been in the Senate since Obama was a little boy. So what is supposed to make us believe that Obama's "right hand man" in the VP position will contribute to that wonderful vague concept of CHANGE? Hah! How dumb does he think we are? Oh, and the latest thing Obama and Biden are touting is that Biden was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Why? Even though he has not lived there for most of his life, PA is a swing state that Obama lost in the primary, so suddenly he becomes a Pennsylvania native son. Hand me my barf bag.